citizens have issued the same warn- ing to the Administr ation leaders' oni innumerable other occasions. But un- like these other warning's, *tbe Ad- ministrat ion cannot poohipooh the ad-î i*ce'6f Mr. Baruh by calling bim an anti-Rooseveit 'partisan wbo wishes to be a dramatic alarmist. He has been a .personal 'friend of the Piesi- dent. He is recognized as. a stauncli Democrat who bas for many years made large conitributions to the Demo- cratic campaign colffers. Objpta to uExtremesP Mr. Baruch is not unsympathetic to the professed social objectives of the New Deal. His c riticismn is directed to its metbods-to the extremes to which. it goes. Because of the "ex- tremes" in what otberwise might be an acceptable approacb to some given. problem, the New Deal laws have often resulted in more harm than good. A greater evil is substituted for soiue evit sought to be coirected.,Wbe bats may be destroyed, but the bouse is burned down! A concrete example of "extrem- ism" in Jegisiative proposais is tbe so- called "reorganization bill" now being debated on the Floor of the Senate. The professed purpose or objective of the bill is to increase the efficiency of the Federal Government. Tbat is truly desirable, and no one can for a moment criticize the objective. But the metbod proposed to accomplisb that objective is "extrenie." Uijitd Power bim the power to abolish agencies, establisb new agencies, and consoli-, date the agencies. It does more than tliat. It goes so far as to vest hjm witb even tbe autbority to change, in whole or in part, a function of goiv- ernment wbenever he secs Ait to do soý. in other words, the proposed bill, would, as a practical mnatteri enable the President to change any policy of goverfiment decided upon by Con- gress. that section which shouid be pointed out. Tbey are indicative of the ever prevale nt extremismn, as well as* the a rtfulness of the New Deal drafts- men. Ther.'.a Catich ta t The measure provides Ithat thei Executive Order mnust be subniitted to Congress anldthat.it ,w'ill, not be- come effective until after 60 days. if' Congress does not act by passing a bill nullifying the Executive -Order witbin tbe 60 days it becomes. ef- fective. ht will be noted that it is not neces- sary for Congress to ratify' tbe Ex-, ecutive Order before it may1j become effective. On the contrarly, the New Dealers prefer to bave it the other Way,. placing 'a 60-day, limitation on Congress witbin wbich to act by way of'nullification. -If Congress dîsagrees witb som e Ececutive Order, ail it can dûi-i to pass a bill nullifying' the ôrder. And it must do so witbin 60 days, otberwise the Order bas the fuît force and effectof law. Why shoulci the Administration prefer the "nullification" process over tbe "ratification" by Congress pro- cess? Is flot tbe "ratification" pro- cedure more in keeping witb the principles of our democracy? It is another example of tbe New Deal 6"extremism." * I.ol.L Veto Club overýride the veto. It will be noted that the reorganiza- tien mieasure does noet provide that an Executive Order may be nullified by enactment of a Concurrent Résolu- tien, where the signature of the Presi- dent is not required. That is too mild for the New Dealers. That would leave tôo mucb power in Congress. Rather, care was 'taken to be certain that the President could veto any bill Congress may pass. to nullify anyb somatLIUion; . ueorg VV * L V.F51jpriaeravii, Skokie --Badminton' -çlub; , Scott C.Ç Greene, president, Evaniston: Badminton club ; Henry 81«trunk, vice-preident, Mldwest Badminton association é- H. E. Theiston, secretary, Minnesota District Badminton. association: Leroy Keyser, Kedionga Badminton club, Fort Wayne, mnd.; L. B. North, treasurer, Town club, M4iiwaukee, Wis., an opportu i for con- siderable savings on a rnio st necessary Inveet- ment. Tertme: Cash. Asic for Mr. Devlin.. MEMORIAL PARK' CE MET RY YOUR RINTAL UO AND CARPETS Deserve. Our M.f'hod of Wifh 'Mfior Repairs Fre of Charge Recognized master-craftsmen for the past 35 years. FOR THE FURST TIME MN HUSTORY At Tis Low Price, IN ARIZONA Frederick C. Little of Kenilworth. and his daughter, Mrs. Roy E. Brack- in of Winnetka have gone to Phoenix, Ariz., for a stay of about a.month.. No-rth We ès ter n uùni son of F. R. Ada in. the .college -of is end is a eral 1arts. 111111 y 1/2 stocks 8Sef.of Devis St. Efvsssf*m-$JNI.meuis4qJ -el- lý-