The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

xiys., d iLes. te bav.,u tmg la j«e a Uy mhed doeun31rl.: i. lieN unm 104 kIem Ung yuvromg.m fto elng ysh.frf.utwu»d Tuaiw.gstNi"me. fam. .xpoelMe.drugl anfoer 49 ryusu'a, amig fuly fftmm.d, en mdi w lve'amded. from Urne toUrnmte adminisra- tion leaders have -been holding con- ferences with the, respective groups interested in certain amendmnents. Trhe administration hopes t6 have the bilI through the senate by the firat of Novembér at.thé latest., .When the ýspecýia;l session was cali- ed many thought the opponents of "'embargo repeal". would attempt to filibuster -the -bill- inta the regular session opening i January. But,ta date there has been no evidence of any disposition on the part of thesel opponents ta delay matters unneces;- sarily.,Nor has there been any indi- cation of administration pressure ta, get êarly action. For the most part the debate bas.been conflned ta the subject and nlo effort has been made ta take any senator from the floor regardless of how long he speaks. A- - - - -# 4U- .. I ~dU ~um~A~ ~ ~~mm.na~ I havre been several hours in length. . IMree Stages The senate debate seems to have gone through three stages. At the outset it was more or lese strictly conftned ta what is the best policy. an embargo or not, for the United States ta remain strictly neutral and not become involved. There then came the second stage wl.en the pro- ponents-o! repeal admitted a change, The substance of this argument was to -the effect that both the ailied powers are demnocracies fightine dic- tatorial aggressors and the United States needs Great Britain in order to have a defense in the- Atlantic. Senator Edward R. Burke, (D), o! Nebraska and Senator Warren R. Austin; (R), o! Vermont, have been the main contenders for repeal o! the embargo on this theory. In the third. week of the. debate last analysis Great Britain and France are as much to~ blame for the situa tion in Europe as Germany, as bad as Hitlerism is. Say ActieusProduceulHi tlerlsm The substance. of this argument has been ta the effeet that history is fillèd with instances of English and French aggression, that their colon-, ial possessions. were obtained, by warfare and they are noW, simply seekmng to protect what they ac-* quired. -It bas, beenpointed out tbat they wrote the Treaty of Versailles, makig te nap of Europe to their own satisfaction, and imposed a- pun- itive peace on Germany. which pro- duced Hlitier. -Much lias been also said, about the refusai, of the allies to pay their debts- ta the. United States. Senatar Ernest Lundeeni, Farmer- Laborer, of Minnesota, and Senator Rush D. Hoit, Democrat, of West Vîrginia, have been the main speak- ersadvacig tb&L particuilar ag- ment. A heated discussion developed i the senate when Senator Lundeen went so far to suggest that the United States should seize British Island possessions i this hemi-. sphere in payment of its deb ts ta the United States contracted during the. iast war. In other words, duririg the last, few days it would seem that the em- phasis in the debate bas shifted ta the question as to whether we should ore eensýIvy than the' questio n as to how we can best be neutrâl.ý It is expected that this generalde- bate wili soon end and the bill itself carefuIly considered f or' amend- ments. Our real problem is not so0 much who caused what war and why, but rather what course we should pursue to keep out of the conflict and give the American peo- pie safety and security. John knSmqth Qompany MN EVANSTON - 16 CHURCI! ST.., EVANSTON OPEN EVERY THURSDAY AM SATUEDAY 'TUL9 PAIL on the National Coliege on comxittee that is ar- rthe program are: Miss i Baker, president of thei Our OisWY Phouat NahiianBrothers fInc. 169 N. A#ê-FIW I6I mUS~D ,ý,ýr