Wilmette Life (Wilmette, Illinois), 31 Dec 1936, p. 13

The following text may have been generated by Optical Character Recognition, with varying degrees of accuracy. Reader beware!

preme Court as ini--. --.. r President must accept the bis as pre- ' compatible with the sentéci to hini in their entirety or veto disupreme,,l-aw of the ineasure in toto. If he shoulci find the land.", Others some particular section undesirable, he will be designeci to must accept it with, the restý of te exst-Simply enlage the, bill or defeat the ýentire measure wit ing powers. of the 'veto. bis Governi-1 Federal it is necessary to, say that Once.againi met. this' proposai is not new. While the Such proposais nsfot raised li the convention qusin ntne.They ar up our Constitution, ii is have been miade be- Ralph E. Church Which' drewvto note. that a provi sion of interestiîîg fore at.v ar io us this nat ure was adopted inl the constitufor Agitation. * history. times ini our confederate States in 1961. theni 'revived with new vigor when the. tion 'of the aditted to the Union since state Every of Suprerne, Court decl*ared, a series has given their governors the New Deal laws unconistitutioial. Wheth-, thattimne veto individual items of bis; er the 75th Congress will adopt aily of: power to1 the governors of presenttime the at them: depends for the nost part upon andi own State' of our incluidinpg States, 39 the the attitude of the President. .What disapprove items in apCourt decides li the. cases now before Illinois, may bis without havýing to veto ht and the resuiting public reaction to propriationmeasure. entire the of the major the decisions may be Advocated B' 'Vaiidenbetk detèrnîining factors. Arthur H. Vandenberg, of Senator Prèidenial Terniis the chief acivocate of such Iii recent weeks two other proposed M*ch*gan, amencimeuit to our Constitution. He, aRniendmients to the Constitution have an a resolution into the 74thi corne into prominence. There has been introduced for that purpose, and those considerable discussion about the advis-1 Congress reaci bis article in the Saturday ability of.chaingilig the terni of the Presi- who August may recal from one of' Evening Post Iast derit of the Uiniteci States to bis intention to was it stated hie that re-election. ti the righit -i.oryr the adoption of the resolutinb tô a single terni of six years. Nor is urge ... bas come into Congress.. 75th the simply ht nroposal rhis fna.riclar _f, this proposal new to uis. . -.one- ol, pmiced atAý&PI ~ow- !!TOMATOe IONA BRAND 324-OZ. hitzd SUdm. AIEN PAGE Pemmit Butter. N. B. C. SLI M.JANE SOILED OR 5Tz JUICE 2 DOLEIS -Oc 19cKU POURAPPm JUICu Babil.' * *LB.419C ~e25c LiverSansnag-o. uuiB"oui ec STAR BRAND RAUNSCHWEIGER SMOKED LOAF10 * 18. 23. MU PIeC"O. , JAR19C intricacies of our national affairs While hie canl be re-electeci, it is argued that terni bis policy is often during bis determiineci, consciously and unconscious-. ly, by what would be* politically expedienit for the next election rather than by that which would be best for the country as a whole in the long run. It is f urther contendeci by the sponsors. of a six year terni that it is unbecomuig of +n l.,.. o - -,of - President _ office the dignity __. of the .flrst I IExecutive to becutneie animr it - i nere is nuouCiening wa there must be retrenchiment in Federal expenditures and it is feit that it wil. bel individual Members of Congress who serve as obstacles to such retrencbmelt because of their "pet" projects and poli-, tical pressure upon tbemn to include certain itenis of appropriation. Next week I sball discuss the argu nient s of. the proponents and opporients of this suggested amexidment, its beneflts ual items. SOAP CIPlS 45-OZ. CAN 5c MEAT 5K 2C L. through Minci the effects of Truto thehelt, lng vty , and niorals of en;. , nc I have f ouMn othi in an Baker Pci Y- L iauo The Unii World,4" n uts

Powered by / Alimenté par VITA Toolkit
Privacy Policy